Analysis and Modeling to evaluate influenza vaccine responses
Slides: https://www.andreashandel.com/presentations/
2023-09-15
Influenza Population Biology
US influenza Incidence. Source: 538.
Influenza Population Biology
US influenza deaths. Nelson & Holmes, Nat Rev Gen 2007
Influenza Population Biology
Influenza in Vietnam. H1N1:orange, H3N2:red, B:blue. Servadio et al, Plos Comp Bio 2023
Current Influenza vaccines
- Need to be reformulated almost every year because of virus evolution
- Need to be taken annually, due to virus evolution and vaccine waning
- Are not very good, even if the vaccine and circulating strains match
Universal flu vaccine challenges
- Many
- How to assess vaccine candidates
How do we define a vaccine response?
Quantifying vaccine responses
Quantifying vaccine responses
Quantifying vaccine responses
- Magnitude: \(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n} log(\textrm{TI}_{n,j=1})\)
- Overall strength: \(\frac{1}{N*J}\sum_{n} \sum_{j} log(\textrm{TI}_{n,j})\)
- Breadth: \(\frac{1}{N*J}\sum_{n} \sum_{j} \textrm{SC}_{n,j}\)
SC = Seroconversion, TI = Titer Increase (D28/D0), n = individuals, j = Strains.
Comparing vaccine responses
A new method to quantify/compare vaccine responses
- Organize strains by (antigenic) distance
- Fit a model to more robustly estimate mangitude/breadth/strength
Strain distance
Strain distance measures
- Time: absolute difference in years of strain isolation.
- Sequence: Some measure based on sequence difference.
- Biophysical: Measures based on computed or expected biophysical properties.
- Phenotypic: Antigenic cartography based on HAI assays.
Strain distance measures
Strain distance measures
Quantifying vaccine responses
Comparing vaccine responses
Testing our method - the data
- Data from UGAFluVac study
- Individuals received vaccine, response to multiple strains was tested
Testing our method - the data
- We sampled strains to mimic different labs performing experiments
Testing our method - the results
The table shows the coefficient of variation for each outcome.
Magnitude |
0.088 |
0.103 |
Breadth |
0.059 |
0.431 |
Overall strength |
0.083 |
0.081 |
Our new method is worse (more variable)!
Testing our method with simulations
Create a universe of 50 possible heterologous strains with varying antigenic distances.
Create 10 lab panels by randomly sampling 9 strains and adding the homologous strain (distance of 0).
For each lab, generate 100 random individuals by simulating flu vaccine response titers from a model that shows linearly reduced response with increasing antigenic distance.
Simulation results
Magnitude |
0.025 |
0.008 |
Breadth |
0.199 |
0.020 |
Overall strength |
0.155 |
0.007 |
Now our new method is better. Hm…
Simulation results with 30% censored data
Magnitude |
0.028 |
0.033 |
Breadth |
0.290 |
0.316 |
Overall strength |
0.137 |
0.071 |
With censored data, the current method looks artificially good.
Conclusions
- Our proposed new method seems to be generally more robust.
- If a good amount of censored data are present, the current method falsely under-estimates the uncertainty.
- Our method also doesn’t fully deal with the censored data yet.
Future work
- We need to update our methods to properly deal with the censored values. Then we can do another comparison of our method and the current approach.
Some other projects
R packages to make modeling easier I
For teaching (stable):
R packages to make modeling easier II
For research (WIP):
Online modeling/analysis courses
Keep going?
Image by Aline Dassel/Pixabay
Pre-vaccination titer and vaccine response
Introduction
- More pre-vaccination titer leads to more post-vaccination titer, but the boost is reduced.
- Called response blunting, antibody ceiling effect, negative interference.
- For a nice summary, see Oidtman et al. 2021 Trends Mic
Pre-vaccination titer and vaccine response
Left: H1N1 vaccine, Right: H5N1 vaccine. Zarnitsyna et al 2015 Phil Trans B.
Pre-vaccination titer and vaccine response
Ranjeva et al 2019 Nat Com
Pre-vaccination titer and vaccine response
Left: H1N1, Right: H3N2. U of Rochester cohort. Moritzky et al 2023 JID.
UGAFluVac cohort
Epitope-masking can explain some of those patterns
Zarnitsyna et al 2015 Phil Trans B, 2016 Plos Path.
Modeling pre-vaccination titer and heterologous vaccine response
Extension of the model can be used to explore predictions for heterologous response.
\[
\begin{aligned}
\textrm{free antigen (type 1)} \qquad \dot{H_f} & = - k_1 A_1 H_f - k_2 A_2 H_f - d_f H_f \\
\textrm{bound antigen (type 1)} \qquad \dot{H_b} & = k_1 A_1 H_f + k_2 A_2 H_f - d_b H_b \\
\textrm{B-cell type 1} \qquad \dot{B_1} & = \frac{s_1 B_1 H_f}{p_1 + H_f} \\
\textrm{antibody type 1} \qquad \dot{A_1} & = g_1 B_1 -k_1 A_1 H_f - d_1 A_1\\
\textrm{B-cell type 2} \qquad \dot{B_2} & = \frac{s_2 B_2 H_f}{p_2 + H_f} \\
\textrm{antibody type 2} \qquad \dot{A_2} & = g_2 B_2 -k_2 A_2 H_f - d_2 A_2 \\
\end{aligned}
\]
With \(k_2 = k_1(1-AD)\), \(s_2 = s_1(1-AD)\)
Modeling pre-vaccination titer and heterologous vaccine response
Extension of the model can be used to explore predictions for heterologous response for different antigenic distance (AD).
Heterologous vaccine response patterns - H1N1
Heterologous vaccine response patterns - H1N1
Heterologous vaccine response patterns - H1N1
Conclusions
We need to dig deeper.
Image by Alexa/Pixabay
Acknowledgements
- Zane Billings - for doing most of the work and creating most of the figures (with Biorender)
- Ted Ross & Andrea Sant - for data sharing
- Many other colleagues and collaborators
- NIH
Questions?
https://phdcomics.com/
- Slides: https://www.andreashandel.com/presentations/
- Contact: https://www.andreashandel.com